May 2005

Some recent postings on Indymedia, in remembrance of this anniversary:

Anniversary of the ‘Battle of the Beanfield’ 1st June 1985
It’s 20 years, since the major trashing of my community, travelling on the way the make the “Peoples Free Festival of Albion” at Stonehenge. It was a regular event on the calender.


The Travellers Situation

Travellers come from many backgrounds. But similarities far outweigh differnces, in peoples expectations on what they want out of life. Recently, politics has come crashing through the door, and trampled their boots, all over the usual suspects of , travellers, asylum seekers, migrants, and the rest …….!

Stonehenge: Further links about it all.

Beanfield Photo Gallery 1
Beanfield Photo Gallery 2

Solstice Ritual:
Injunction Papers:
My cell notes:
The Story so far:
All Systems:

Jamie Doward, social affairs editor
Sunday May 29, 2005
The Observer,6903,1494944,00.html

The government’s plans to introduce identity cards were dealt a body blow last night after it emerged the true cost of the scheme could top £18 billion, more than triple the official estimate.
The figure has been calculated by experts at the London School of Economics, who have spent months producing one of the most authoritative analyses of the scheme.

Their findings, which will be published in the next two weeks, will be seized upon by critics of the current ID card bill working its way through parliament. It is likely to spark a backbench rebellion from Labour MPs and be taken up by the Tories and Liberal Democrats, who oppose the government’s plans.

Last week the Home Office issued a report which estimated that, over the next decade, the cost of running the scheme, in conjunction with a new biometric passport system, would be £5.8bn. Because the Treasury has insisted the scheme must be self-financing, this works out at an average cost of £93 to each card holder.

But, according to the LSE’s analysis, a draft section of which has been obtained by The Observer, the true cost of implementing and running the scheme, will be between £12bn and £18bn. This could make the average cost of a card as high as £300 to every adult, unless government departments are prepared to shoulder some of the financial burden.

The LSE believes the government has grossly underestimated the cost of the technology involved in making the system work. Last week the government estimated the biometric card readers needed to scan the cards would cost £250-£750. ‘A more likely figure … would be in the range of £3,000 to £4,000 per unit,’ the report suggests.

The report also raises doubts about whether the government is right to assume a 10-year life span for each card. ‘All technical and scientific literature indicates that biometric certainty diminishes over time, and it is therefore likely that a biometric – particularly fingerprints and facial features – will have to be re-scanned at least every five years. This cost must be taken into account.’

A further problem, which the government appears not to have factored in, is ‘refuseniks’ – people who will not co-operate. ‘There is evidence that this population could create a substantial additional cost burden. The administrative costs of handling this group will be substantial,’ the report states.

The LSE also questions the strain placed on the system by individuals notifying a change in their personal circumstances, as they will be required to do so by law.

‘This requirement may result in [between] 300 million and 1.2 billion contacts with the register over 10 years,’ the report says. ‘This additional cost must be taken into account. If human management is necessary to ensure changes are verified, this facet will add between £1bn and £4 bn to the 10-year rollout of the scheme.’

The scheme, which will see some 44 million people issued with a card containing personal details including their name, date of birth and address, is considered controversial because personal details on the central database can be accessed by public sector organisations, without the individual’s consent.

But immigration and asylum minister Tony McNulty defended the plan. ‘A secure compulsory national identity card scheme will help tackle illegal immigration, organised crime, ID fraud, terrorism and will benefit all UK citizens,’ he said.

Opposition parties have expressed concern about the costs of the scheme. Critics have also pointed out that previous government IT projects have run considerably over budget. New systems for the Child Support Agency and the Passport Office were plagued with problems.

But the government has pointed out that it has ‘road-tested’ the combined ID and biometric passport scheme, one of the UK’s most ambitious IT projects, on 10,000 volunteers.

Under the scheme a microchip will hold biometric details including an iris scan, fingerprints and facial image, making it difficult to forge. But the trials revealed significant error rates, raising concerns about its efficacy.

Ministers anticipate that the system will be introduced in a phased roll-out. By 2013 it is expected that it will become compulsory to have an ID card, although holders will not have to carry them at all times. A recent poll showed that half of people questioned believed ID cards were the best weapon in combating identity theft, which is estimated to cost Britain £1.3bn a year.

A spokesman for the Home Office said it was impossible to comment on the LSE’s findings because of the confidential nature of the commercial contracts involved

But the LSE report notes: ‘The ongoing dispute over costs is due in large part to the fact that the government is either not certain exactly what the ID infrastructure will entail, or is unwilling to disclose these details.’

Pictures on my FotoBlog at:

Nottingham Arboretum celebrates the May Bank Holiday with a festival embracing all things green. Live bands, monsters, fun for children and sustainable produce. Stalls, including crafts, plants, local produce, energy conservation demonstrations, wind and solar power, social struggles and human rights issues etc and plenty of other organic, eco-friendly activities.

Arboretum on Sunday 29th May, 12 noon – 6pm, FREE


also there were some Scary Furry Monsters. Music was being performed, kids playing, people browsing the stalls when all of a sudden, we were confronted by a couple of monsters. They seemed to come out of nowhere!

One had horns, the other exceptionally large eyes, both were multi coloured and very, very furry. Kids ran about in all directions.

A council spokesman stated “he had never seen anything like it”. He had however heard of an outfit called Monster Massive and wondered if it was them. Asked if he had anything else to say, he said “it was very Scary”.

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police at the scene said “he didn’t believe a word of it.

Picture of monsters to be seen at:


Nottingham Greenweeks

‘Celebrate Sustainability’ in Greater Nottingham by participating in three weeks of special events and activities that link the global to the local.

To give an idea of why looking for some alternatives need to be urgently investigated, check out my earlier post on Indymedia at:

Nottingham Against Incineration and Landfill [NAIL] Protest against expansion

also, I have put up the leaked Draft G8 Climate Change Decisions and Sustainable Energy

Pictures on my FotoBlog at:

There we were, hanging out at the Nottingham Green Festival, held this year for the first time in the Arboretum Park, Nottingham. Music was being performed, kids playing, people browsing the stalls when all of a sudden, we were confronted by a couple of monsters. They seemed to come out of nowhere!

One had horns, the other exceptionally large eyes, both were multi coloured and very, very furry. Kids ran about in all directions.

A council spokesman stated “he had never seen anything like it”. He had however heard of an outfit called Monster Massive and wondered if it was them. Asked if he had anything else to say, he said “it was very Scary”.

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police at the scene said “he didn’t believe a word of it. However, they had sent the force helicopter with marksmen onboard, just as a precaution you understand……. ”

For further information on Monster Massive, please take a peek at their website at:

The Arboretum, Saturday 28 May, 12pm – 6pm, FREE

Pictures of the event on my FotoBlog at:


This was a typical, council sponsored, event.

They came, some got entertained, and then they went home. I think community festivals could be so much more. Including more community involvement. Still, what do I know about it ?

This is the council blerb about it:


A great day out at Nottingham’s Arboretum Festival Weekend

Two popular Nottingham festivals have teamed up this year for a Bank Holiday showcase of entertainment, activities, stalls and a chance to learn more about people, the planet and peace.

Nottingham Arboretum Festival on Saturday, May 28 from 12 noon until 6pm features live bands, DJ’s, stalls, street artists and workshops, children’s activities, traditional English folk dance, a brass band, food stalls and lots more. Organisers are delighted to be showcasing local creative talent with Nottingham bands Trickster playing dirty funk/roots/rock, Horny Batacada playing latin/samba/funk, Neon Set playing 60’s psychedelic rock and popular local DJ’s Rick Donohue and Dave Boultbee.

The Privacy International’s notorious Big Brother Awards will be happening again from 7.15pm on Thursday 23rd June. Always a chaotic and fun night.

The venue is the Quad of the LSE. Cheap drinks as always, and this year we will be going late into the evening. DJ Rick will be playing the tunes, and we’ll have a quiet area for people who want to relax and chat. Our MC for the evening will be Chris Green, the comic mastermind behind stand-up stage characters Tina C and Ida Barr.

I’m also reliably informed that Darth Vader and a few of his friends will
be making an appearance to collect awards.

E-mail Rick at for information.

I won a ‘Winston’ in the first year of the awards in 1998

I rated this ladies work. I thought of her when walking in Wales or the Peak District. Looking through the viewfinder, I found myself frequently thinking, ‘what would Fay do, about this scene’. I’m sad!

Photographer Fay Godwin, one of the UK’s most acclaimed landscape and portrait photographers, has died at 74.

Godwin was known for her images of the British countryside as well as portraits of authors such as Ted Hughes and Doris Lessing.

Born in Berlin in 1931, Godwin settled in London in her late 20s.

Paul Hill, professor of photography at De Montfort University, Leicester, and a friend, said she died in Hastings, East Sussex, after a short illness.

“Fay Godwin’s photographs were about the real world and real people, but imaginatively transformed and enhanced by a sensitive, perceptive and often ironic and critical eye,” Prof Hill said.

Godwin won a string of prestigious awards for her work after becoming interested in photography while taking photos of her children.

She was awarded an honorary fellowship of the Royal Photographic Society in 1990 and had a major retrospective at the Barbican Centre in London in 2001.

Draft G8 Climate Change Decisions and Sustainable Energy text for FASS May 3rd

Our world is warming. Climate change is a serious long-term threat that has the potential to affect every part of the globe. And we know that by increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, mankind’s activities are contributing to this warming. This is an issue we must address now.

At the same time, the world’s energy needs are growing rapidly. Access to secure, reliable and affordable energy sources is fundamentally important for economic stability and growth.

Meeting these energy needs in a sustainable way is one of the greatest long-term challenges we face as a global community.

We have already made a start. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was a landmark agreement. We reaffirm our commitment to the UNFCCC and to its aim, to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

At Evian and again at Sea Island, we agreed on the need for the G8 to work together to develop innovative clean energy technologies. And there are already many examples of progress at all levels, ranging from the actions of individual companies, to cities and states, to national and international action.

Now, we need to accelerate our efforts. There is a powerful case for urgent action to develop and deploy cleaner and more efficient technologies:

There is now compelling evidence that [statement on scientific evidence of the need for action].

Local air pollution is a serious threat to human health and to ecosystems, particularly in the developing world. Every year, it causes millions of premature deaths, and suffering to millions more through respiratory disease. Through efficiency improvements and cleaner technologies, significant improvements to air quality and major human health benefits are possible.

Diverse and reliable energy supplies are essential to economic growth. Security of energy supply is a major concern to us all, particularly at this time of higher energy prices. We need to work together to make the most efficient use of our existing energy resources, and to shift to new, non-fossil fuel sources of energy.

Access to energy is essential for economic development, poverty alleviation and quality of life. Innovations in technology offer the potential to provide energy even to remote communities both sustainably and at a competitive cost.

Climate variability and natural disasters already seriously undermine economic development and political stability. Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, threatening future economic growth and human security.

Clear and early signals about the direction of policy from governments, and stable long-term policy frameworks, can promote innovation and provide the private sector with the confidence it needs to invest in cleaner technologies, minimising the costs of adjustment.

We now face a moment of opportunity. Some $16 trillion will be invested in the world’s energy systems over the next 25 years. If through our combined efforts, a growing share of this investment can be directed towards cleaner technologies, then we have a real hope of transforming our energy systems.

If we miss this opportunity and fail to give a clear sense of direction, then we will be locked into an unsustainable future that will threaten our long-term security and prosperity.

The world’s developed economies have a responsibility to lead this agenda, and to work in partnership with the developing world to support strong and sustainable economic growth. The G8 therefore pledge to take action to promote a fundamental step change in the way we produce and use energy.

We will improve the policy, regulatory and financing environment for clean energy technologies, to support rapid deployment and encourage private investment. We will implement new measures to promote research and development. We will encourage businesses and consumers to consider the energy implications of their choices. And we will promote the transfer of technologies to developing countries, taking into account their own energy needs and priorities.

These actions will demonstrate that we are united in our aim of achieving substantial greenhouse gas reductions and moving towards a low-carbon global economy.

We also need to consider how we deal with the impacts of our changing climate. Many developing countries already struggle to cope with existing climate variability and are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. We are concerned that the long-term effects of climate change may threaten the very existence of some small island developing States. We therefore pledge to take steps to improve the resilience of the world’s most vulnerable countries to the risks of further climate change.

Tackling climate change, and promoting clean technologies, is a challenge that will require our concerted efforts over a sustained period. [To be added: section on implementation / follow-up]

Programme of Action on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy
We agree to take forward actions in the following key areas:

Transforming the way we use energy

Powering a cleaner future

Promoting research and development

Financing the transition to cleaner energy

Managing the impact of climate change

Transforming the way we use energy
Improvements to energy efficiency are the lowest cost way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. They often pay for themselves, saving money and conserve scarce energy resources. Already, progress has been made. Today, IEA countries emit only half the amount of CO2 per unit of GDP that they did thirty years ago, and energy efficiency technologies accounted for 80% of that reduction. However, the rate of energy efficiency improvement has slowed in the last 15 years – we need to create a further step change in the efficiency of our economies.

Energy efficiency is also a key issue for many non-IEA countries. We note, for instance, that China has an aspiration to halve the energy intensity of its economy by 2020.

At Evian, we agreed that energy efficiency is a key area for G8 action. And following agreement at the Sea Island Summit in 2004, the 3Rs initiative was launched in Japan this year – an important step towards encouraging more efficient use of resources and materials, which increases economic competitiveness whilst decreasing environmental impacts.

Transforming the way we use energy: Buildings
Energy consumption associated with buildings accounts for almost half of total final energy consumption in some G8 countries. Improving the energy efficiency of our existing building stock and raising standards for new build will deliver significant energy savings and lower operating costs.

Examples of action by G8 nations include implementation of the EU Buildings Directive, which lays down requirements for minimum standards for energy performance of buildings, and the home retrofit programme in Canada, which provides advice and financing to home owners to make their homes more energy efficient.

G8 Commitments

We will improve the efficiency of our building stock by:

Setting ambitious targets and timetables for reducing carbon emissions from the non-domestic public buildings we procure in our countries, reporting back to the G8 Summit in [2007]

Inviting the International Energy Agency (IEA) to lead a programme on transforming the market for energy efficient buildings. To do this we ask the IEA to:

undertake a study to review existing global building standards and codes

use its analysis to develop and implement a programme to promote the transformation of the market for the G8 and other interested countries

submit a progress report to the G8 in [2006]

develop a Technical Assistance Facility to assist in the development of better policy frameworks for buildings in developing countries

Transforming the way we use energy: Appliances
Residential appliances and equipment use 30% of all electricity generated in OECD countries. We should ensure that appliances on the market are designed to minimise energy use. In particular, we should look for opportunities to address the high levels of energy consumption from appliances on standby: across the G8, standby power consumes the equivalent of the output of twenty full-scale power stations.

G8 Commitments

Recognising that innovation in energy efficiency will be encouraged by coherent international policies on labelling and standards, G8 countries agree to:

Fully endorse the IEA’s 1 Watt Initiative, and pledge to support the IEA in establishing frameworks for reporting on these commitments by G8 countries

Publish, through the IEA, their national priorities, product standards and participation in co-operative initiatives

Work nationally and in co-operation with other countries to improve the environmental performance of products in priority sectors, including through the UN Marrakech process

Explore the potential for further co-ordination of standards, including with non-G8 countries

Transforming the way we use energy: Road transport
Transport energy use is expected to nearly double worldwide by 2030. However, improvements in fuel efficiency and new technologies offer the opportunity to reduce both local and global pollutants. Policies such as vehicle labelling and tax incentives can encourage consumers to take up these technologies.

G8 Commitments

We agree to take actions to develop and promote the uptake of cleaner vehicles, by:

Setting ambitious targets and timetables for future sales of clean, low carbon vehicles in our countries and consider similar targets for the public procurement of these vehicles

Raising consumer awareness of the environmental impact of their vehicle choices. We will support initiatives such as the energy efficiency labelling of new cars, and where possible we will develop plans for the introduction of energy efficiency labels in our own countries

Agreeing to co-operate on technology development in areas including hydrogen vehicles, battery performance, and cleaner fuels including biofuels, with a view to making improvements in greenhouse gas emissions and local air quality

Welcoming the United Kingdom’s initiative in hosting an international environmentally friendly vehicles conference in November as part of its G8 Presidency, following up on a previous Japanese event, and calling on all countries to attend and contribute to it at a high level

Transforming the way we use energy: Aviation
Aviation makes a significant and rising contribution to emissions of both local and global pollutants, although improvements in technology and in operational issues have the potential to limit emissions growth. In 1999 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, which is the seminal work on aviation climate science; there would be great benefit from updating this work to take into account recent research.

G8 Commitments

The G8 commit to:

Undertake a programme of collaborative work to explore and accelerate the potential for operational advances that will improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions in air transport

Commission [organisation] to conduct an assessment of the latest scientific understanding of aviation’s impacts on the climate

Provide [$X] for additional climate science research, aimed at improving our understanding of specific issues such as contrails and cirrus cloud effects, with the intention of using this to inform technological and operational responses

Work to co-ordinate our existing national research programmes on long-term technologies

Transforming the way we use energy: Industry
Each year commercial banks and international financial institutions (IFIs) invest, lend, mobilise or support capital expenditure valued at billions of dollars in a range of industrial and power projects. Commercial banks and IFIs are ideally placed to help their clients to reduce energy consumption, thereby cutting costs and emissions, and offering the potential for carbon credit sales under the Kyoto mechanisms.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, for instance, has introduced an energy savings assessment for investments in energy intensive sectors as part of their credit approval process. Although client action on the results of the assessments is completely voluntary, the rate of client uptake of audit recommendations is around 80%.

There is also significant value in benchmarking the energy efficiency performance of different technologies in key sectors. Making this type of information widely available is a powerful way to promote the take-up of more efficient technologies.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Call on the Multilateral Development Banks to conduct energy savings assessments for all investments in new or expansion projects in energy intensive sectors, drawing on a [$X] fund to be established by the G8 for this purpose

Call on Export Credit Agencies to promote awareness of this facility among project developers

Invite the IEA to carry out an initial analysis of energy efficiency measures, technologies and national policies, globally on a sector by sector basis, covering industrial efficiency, buildings, appliances, and vehicles

Establish a clearing house open to all nations that contains information on available technologies, best practices and national policies to encourage deployment of energy efficiency technologies

Powering a Cleaner Future
Reliable and affordable energy supplies are essential for strong economic growth, both in the G8 countries and in the rest of the world. Access to energy is also critical for poverty alleviation: in the developing world, 2 billion people lack access to modern energy services.

We commit to taking action to improve the efficiency of energy generation and transmission, and to maximise the potential of alternative sources of energy. We will also work to ensure that these technologies are made accessible to the developing world.

We focus particularly here on actions around the cleaner use of fossil fuels and on renewable power, as well as issues around transmission. [Statement on nuclear power, to be added following discussions].

We express our support for research into the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier, and of the work of the International Partnership for the Hydrogen Economy in co-ordinating research efforts in this area.

Powering a cleaner future: Cleaner Fossil Fuels
Improving the efficiency of fossil fuel generation
The world has substantial reserves of coal, and this fuel will continue to be an important part of the global energy mix in the coming decades. However, coal power generation generates the highest greenhouse gas emissions of all power generation options, approximately twice that of gas power generation. There are also impacts on human health, through local air pollution and through the safety risks associated with coal extraction.

There is considerable scope to reduce emissions from coal plants by ensuring that existing plant operates to its best potential, and by encouraging the transfer and uptake of new high-efficiency technologies, which need to be made available at an economic cost. Many of these measures also have the potential to be applied to gas and oil generation.

G8 Commitments

We will support the efficient operation of existing and new power plants by:

Working with the IEA to hold workshops in major coal using economies to review and share experiences of bilateral work on energy efficiency assessments for power plants, and to recommend options to make best practice more accessible.

Contributing to a [$X] fund to follow up on the workshops for a programme of further assessments and dissemination, co-ordinated by the IEA, and building on existing programmes

Calling on the IEA to carry out a benchmarking study of recently constructed plants, assessing which have the highest efficiencies and lowest emissions, and to disseminate this information widely, with a view to helping decision makers understand the benefits of new higher-efficiency technologies

Implementing a programme of projects to demonstrate the potential of advanced technologies

Supporting the World Bank/IFC review of existing environmental guidelines for new build power projects, and encouraging them to include a stronger reference to greenhouse gas emissions, alongside references to other pollutants

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
Capturing and storing the carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuel power generation has the potential for emissions reductions on a very large scale. But many technical, economic and public acceptance issues are yet to be resolved.

The CSLF (Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum), a US initiative, is the major international co-ordinating forum for research into this technology.

G8 Commitments

We agree to accelerate the development of CCS technology by:

Agreeing to fund a [$X] collaborative research programme to determine the viability of geological CO2 storage in developing countries

Inviting the IEA to undertake an urgent study on definitions, costs, scope and regulatory options for ‘capture ready’ plant, with a view to establishing the feasibility of aiming to build all new coal plants in a way which leaves open the option of retrofitting CCS in the future

Implementing a programme of projects to demonstrate the potential of CCS technologies, to include demonstrating “capture ready” plant in a developing country

Endorsing the objectives and activities of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, and agreeing to expand the work of Forum to work with broader civil society to address the barriers to the public acceptability of CCS technology, and to look at how planning and regulatory frameworks can be strengthened

Capturing energy from methane
Methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, is the major component of natural gas, and losses from natural gas systems account for an estimated 16% of worldwide methane emissions. If this gas could be used rather than wasted, there would be significant benefits for energy supply and emissions reductions. Coalbed methane is a further potential source of energy.

The World Bank hosts a major international partnership on gas flaring called the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR). In addition, the US leads the Methane-to-Markets Partnership focusing on advancing cost-effective, near-term methane recovery and use as a clean energy source.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Express our support for the Methane to Markets initiative and the World Bank Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership, and encourage expanded participation of all interested nations and of stakeholders

Work through the Bank to extend the GGFR Partnership beyond 2006

Powering a cleaner future: Renewable Power
Renewables have an important role in the future energy mix. The IEA estimate that, with the right policies in place, renewables could account for 32% of electricity generation by 2050. The G8 challenge is level the playing field with conventional technologies, and to reduce costs so that they become economically viable in both developed and developing countries.

Bioenergy has significant potential to contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as well as providing a range of other benefits, including access to cleaner and reliable energy services for the poor, sustainable agriculture and land use, and waste management. There is significant potential to share experience, particularly from the developing world: Brazil, in particular, has developed a successful bioenergy industry. [Add reference to conclusions of Italian conference on bioenergy]

G8 Commitments

We will support the development of renewable energy by:

Creating a Review Mechanism to monitor the global uptake of renewable energy and to promote the achievement of Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and Bonn International Action Programme on Renewable Energy, starting with a Conference at the end of 2005, hosted by the Chinese government

[Subject to the forthcoming Italian conference]: Launching a major international Global Bioenergy Partnership as an ongoing effort to support wider biomass and biofuels deployment. In this partnership, we will work with developing countries on sharing best practice and case studies in biomass energy use, application, financing and national policy frameworks, including environmental safeguards.

Providing [$X] to [the Partnership? – to be confirmed] to enable developing countries to build capacity, undertake R&D and assess opportunities for bioenergy

Powering a cleaner future: Electricity Grids
As well as changes to the way power is generated, there may need to be changes to the way power is transmitted. The growth of renewable and distributed generation technologies represent fresh challenges that the electricity networks of tomorrow will need to accommodate.

G8 Commitments

Today we agree to:

Commission the IEA to draw together research into the problems of integrating renewable energy sources into networks, and produce a report for G8 governments, which would be discussed at a conference in late 2006

Work with the IEA to identify and link “Centres of Excellence” to promote research and development in the developed and developing world

Promote workshops during 2006/07 aimed at overcoming technical, regulatory and commercial issues

Promoting research and development
We recognise the need to achieve faster progress in R&D and encourage full participation by developing countries. This means identifying challenges along the path for individual technologies, and adopting goals to move them further and faster.

Promoting research and development: R&D networks
There is a vast amount of research work across the field of energy technologies globally. There is clearly value to be had in joining up our efforts.

G8 Commitments

[Subject to outcomes of the WIRE meeting: We take note of the outcomes of the Energy Research and Innovation Workshop held in Oxford in May 2005, and agree to:

Create a global virtual network to identify energy research areas of common interest and facilitate ongoing cooperation

Set up and contribute to a global repository of energy research findings

Establish a [$X] fund to enable developing countries to participate in relevant international research projects.]

Promoting research and development: International ‘Carbon Challenge’ Prize
There exist several areas in which traditional funding streams are failing and increased momentum could usefully be added. Prizes have been shown to raise the level of research into particular areas where other incentives may fail.

Russia currently administers an annual Global Energy International Prize that rewards scientists and researchers that have made significant advances in the field of energy production or conservation.

G8 Commitments

We acknowledge the value of the Russian prize in raising the awareness of the importance of energy research, and agree:

To build on this with a [$X] G8 prize fund, administered by the IEA, to encourage new technology research achievements that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Financing the transition to cleaner energy
The IEA estimates that $16 trillion will be invested in energy infrastructure worldwide before 2030. We believe that there is now a real opportunity now to shift a growing share of this investment towards cleaner energy technologies.

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: IFI and Export Credit Agency financing for clean technology
International financial institutions such as the World Bank are well placed to provide their clients with advice on improving their energy consumption. The World Bank has already announced that it would be committing to an average growth rate of 20 percent per year over the next five years for lending on renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. The G8 believes that the IFIs can do more to highlight the benefits of cleaner technologies to clients and increase their uptake, without imposing new conditionality.

In addition, Export Credit Agencies could have a key role in assisting in the deployment of renewable energy systems, if the higher upfront costs, longer payback periods and greater perceived risks associated with these projects can be addressed. Already, progress is being made, with the recent OECD agreement to extend credit terms for renewable energy projects to 15 years, in line with current provisions for nuclear power.

G8 Commitments

We agree:

To call on the World Bank to increase the share of total energy sector investments made on lower carbon and energy efficiency technologies beyond existing targets

To further call on the World Bank to ensure that ‘lower-carbon’ development options are integrated into its Country Assistance Strategies for countries with the highest predicted energy requirements

To encourage the multilateral development banks to establish policy dialogues with borrower countries to look at how the economic incentives of energy suppliers and consumers can be better aligned with the efficient production and use of energy

[To be added: IFI initiative on new financing platform for clean technologies]

To support a successful replenishment of the GEF this year, and to encourage the GEF to examine how market based carbon finance mechanisms can be better harnessed in the deployment of clean energy technologies

That our Export Credit Agencies should work to lower the cost of capital for cleaner energy projects, increase the low carbon energy percentage of their portfolios, create favourable provisions for low carbon technologies and lift the ceiling for local content

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: Emissions Trading and Offset Mechanisms
Emissions trading schemes and offset mechanisms are an effective tool to find least-cost reductions in emissions of key pollutants. By providing a clear and sustained price signal to business and long-term policy certainty, they have the potential to mobilise significant investment. Consistency in the core design features of different schemes is important to reduce costs to business, and to facilitate links between schemes to increase market liquidity.

The US pioneered emissions trading with a sulphur dioxide trading scheme in 1995. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is the world’s first comprehensive carbon trading scheme. Preparations are already underway for a scheme in Canada, and are under consideration in Japan and Russia.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Promote a multi-stakeholder dialogue on the technical aspects of emissions trading for carbon and for other pollutants, in order to build institutional capacity, share best practice and identify opportunities at local, regional and national levels for enhancing schemes’ compatibility to facilitate linking, with the aim of exploring ways to creating deep and liquid trading markets for emissions quotas

Those of us who have ratified the Kyoto Protocol confirm that we attach great importance to the successful operation of the flexible mechanisms (Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism), and undertake to work together to strengthen the implementation of these. As a first step, we pledge [$X] by the end of 2005 to improve the funding of the CDM Executive Board

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: Capacity building for policy, regulatory and financial issues
Policy, regulatory and financing frameworks need to be developed to provide a commercially attractive balance of risk and reward to private investors. Organisations such as UNEP, the UNDP and IEA, and initiatives such as the Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP), MEDREP, and REN21, are already doing important work in this area, which the G8 can build on.

G8 Commitments

We recognise the need to establish solid policy, regulatory and financial frameworks, particularly in the developing countries, and agree:

To commit [$X] million to fund the post-Johannesburg partnerships to develop a facility dedicated to the development of markets in sustainable energy in the major developing countries, including the facilitation of innovative finance models

Managing the impact of climate change
We recognise that some degree of climate change is already happening, and that even with concerted efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, further changes are inevitable given the inertia in our climate system.

Potential risks include increased frequency of droughts and floods, economic damage to agriculture and infrastructure, water stress, health impacts, and risks to coastal populations due to sea level rises. The February 2005 UK conference in Exeter on “Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change” provided an up-to-date assessment of the scientific evidence on these and other impacts.

The adverse effects of climate change present significant risks to sustainable growth and development, and could undermine the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.

Managing the impact of climate change: Risk Management
Development activities in relevant sectors (such as agriculture and infrastructure) need to take into account the potential impact of future climate risks. In some cases, climate-risk will be negligible, while in others it could be potentially significant. A systematic approach for distinguishing between such cases is required, so that development activities can be adapted, if necessary, at the discretion of the lender-borrower.

G8 Commitments

We look forward to further discussions on how development strategies can be strengthened to build national resistance to climate impacts, including at the Millennium Review Summit in September 2005, and agree to:

Invite the World Bank to develop and implement ‘best practice’ guidelines for screening its development portfolio for climate risks, as well as how best to manage those risks, in consultation with local communities. We call on the Bank to have these guidelines ready by the end of 2006

Invite other major multilateral and bilateral development organisations to develop and implement equivalent guidelines, and to report back on progress in 2007

Managing the impact of climate change: Africa
Africa is already vulnerable to climate variability and, like many developing countries, is now starting to experience the impacts of climate change. There is a particular need for Africa to develop the scientific capacity that will allow governments to integrate climate factors into development planning and resilience strategies.

The G8 agreed at Evian to strengthen international cooperation on global Earth observations. This is being taken forward through the development of a coordinating framework (GEOSS or Global Earth Observations System of Systems).

G8 Commitments

We will continue to exercise leadership in the area of Earth observation, and agree to:

Provide [$X] to strengthen the Regional Climate Outlook Forums (RCOF) in Africa, through the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), with a view to developing fully operational regional climate centres in Africa

Invite these regional climate centres to report on progress made to the Board of GCOS in 2007

Posted on this chaps blog:

I have also included the original .PDF Do take a peek.

and you can be updated on comments to this, using his ‘feed’ at:

Information just in.

Universities these days are subject to many tests, ratings and measurements … REAs, TQAs … all of these leave out one vital factor, in fact the one most important measure of the quality of a university. What is this elusive measure?

Duck Density :: That’s right, the ultimate mark of a university’s prowess and brilliance is it’s Duck Density. In recognition of this fact, has been set up so that those who have the dilemma of where to spend the next three or four years of their life can be truly informed … and so that those who’ve already made the decision can have a bit of fun 😉

I don’t know if this helps …… But

I covered this subject last year. Do check out my FotoBlog at:

Ducks, an exercise in cuteness

I didn’t count them though. The bastards kept moving about.

New media sector of the UK’s National Union of Journalists (NUJ), have now got a blog. Check out at:

The sector was officially established in April 2005 to provide advice and support for professional journalists working in online publishing or digital media. Join the NUJ community of 35,000 journalists – one of the biggest journalists’ unions in the world.

Rave misery for villagers Cambridge Evening News, UK – 10 May 2005 51a5d-f66d-49cb-bcfc-059c04f130f9.lpf

RAVERS are making weekend nights a misery in a village on the outskirts of Cambridge. Cambridgeshire police said they were aware of the raves.

Insp Paul Ormerod, of the South Cambridgeshire sector, said: “These events are being held on private land, making it a complex issue to deal with.

“We are aware of the on-going problem at the site and have held meetings with other agencies, including the district council and fire service, to try to find out the legality of these evenings.

“We are looking at all options in response to the events, and will be taking positive action in the near future.”


Police campaign to prevent rave

11 May 2005

Police are trying to prevent the return of illegal raves to Smeatharpe near Honiton, writes Sally Munro.

This year Police are again part of a South West regional operation warning people not to try and set up illegal raves.

The South West is considered to be one of a number of susceptible areas in the UK for illegal raves.

Operation Pell aims to minimise the disruption to communities by cracking down on illegal festivals.

Insp Norman Amey, in charge of the operation, said: “In previous years we have had problems with people who were unable to buy tickets for Glastonbury, trying to set up alternative sites in our force area.

“The airfield at Smeatharpe has been targeted in the past, and we will be putting a specific operation in place to prevent mass trespass or illegal raves at the site.

“We have the powers to stop these illegal gatherings and to seize equipment, and will do so if necessary to protect the rights and lifestyles of the community, as well as preventing serious injury and hazards to health of those attending.

“Although there is a specific operation for the airfield, we are also aware that this sort of gathering may happen anywhere across the force.”

The public can assist police by reporting any suspicious activity around open land or disused buildings by calling 08452 777444.


Butterflies Endangered By Psy Trance Hippies

Thousands cause rave woods damage

Tuesday, 17 May, 2005, 11:21 GMT 12:21 UK

The prospect of raves being staged in the Kent countryside is being investigated by police after one event caused damage to ancient woodland.

Kent Police said there was intelligence that other raves were being planned.

A spokesman said: “We’re working on that and we will do everything we can in our powers to stop it.”


Police Prevent Illegal Rave
12:48 Tuesday 17 May 2005

Thames Valley Police in West Berkshire prevented a huge rave from going ahead on the Ridgeway this weekend.

More than 90 vehicles with three large sound systems were stopped from entering land near Aldworth after a tip off from an off-duty officer who overheard plans for the rave. The rave was planned for the early hours of last Sunday, 15th May, but officers managed to stop it taking place. Fifty-six officers from Berkshire and Oxfordshire were involved in the operation – mounted under Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, which gives officers the authority to turn people away from an illegal gathering such as a rave.

Officers spread out around the area of Streetley, Compton and Aldworth and stopped vehicles as they tried to reach rural land on the Ridgeway throughout the early hours of Sunday.

Supt. Jim Trotman, local police area commander of West Berkshire, said: “From a local police perspective these events cause considerable damage in rural communities. A recent rave near East Hendred caused significant damage to livestock within the West Berkshire part of the Ridgeway and many of the local people I work with complained to me after the event.”

“We, and our partners in the local authority, take the prevention of illegal raves very seriously. This past weekend was just such a time and police officers from across Oxfordshire and Berkshire successfully prevented a convoy of some 90 vehicles with three separate sound systems from setting up a rave on the Ridgeway.”

“This kind of operation is one that takes considerable numbers of officers away from other duties but these raves are unlicensed, rarely have any safety considerations and quite frequently involve large numbers of people disrupting the lives of others. Rural communities need policing as much as their urban counterparts. I have no doubt that where we can we will be seeking to intervene in more raves over the coming summer months. I hope that putting a rather more forthright police case with regard to raves will allow local people to understand that local policing is still very much able to deal with the bigger problems that sometimes beset our more rural communities.”


Hundreds attend illegal rave

23 May 2005 12:53

Hundreds of people descended on Forestry Commission land near Thetford yesterday for an illegal rave.

It comes just a week after four raves were held in the county, stretching police resources.

Last week Norfolk police announced that it was looking at how to deal with illegal raves and ways of working more closely with environmental health officers and local authorities to stop unlicensed events and take action against organisers.

It’s the 20th anniversary of the trashing of my tribe there ‘lest we forget!’

Solstice Ritual:
The Story so far:


My recent Indymedia posting, about the history of the subject

This lot gives you some of the background

* * * * * *

But now, news from the last few days ……..

BBC News

Warning over illegal forest raves

Groups planning illegal gatherings in Savernake Forest, Wiltshire, over the bank holiday weekend have been warned they will be “vigorously” dealt with.
Wiltshire police are on standby after receiving reports that rave parties or music festivals are likely to be held.

In previous years, officers have been called to deal with cars being parked illegally throughout the woodland area and loud music being played.

Inspector Jerry Dawson says action will be taken to prevent similar offences.

“We will enforce current legislation vigorously and, with the land owner’s permission, and in consultation with the relevant town or parish councils, we will take positive action,” he said.

* * * * * *

Wlitshire Police Press Release:

23/05/2005 – Savernake forest is no place for a party!

Wiltshire Police will be paying close attention to Savernake Forest and surrounding area throughout the Bank Holiday weekend after reports of groups aiming to camp out and possibly set up raves or music festivals have been received.

In the past the Savernake Forest has been a target for groups with vehicles being parked throughout the woodland area and loud music annoying residents for miles around. However this year police intend to step in and prevent raves and music festivals from taking place by working in partnership with the The Earl Of Cardigan, local community, Parish Councils, Marlborough Town Council and the Forestry Commission.

Inspector Jerry Dawson, the area commander for Marlborough, has been pleased with the recent success of preventing such illegal Music Festivals, but makes it clear that the Bank Holiday weekend is seen as a potential target that will have dedicated police units on standby throughout. He said:

‘It must be clearly understood by anyone thinking about coming to the area with the intention of setting up a rave or festival that they are not welcome. We will enforce current legislation vigorously and, with the land owner’s permission, and in consultation with the relevant Town or Parish Councils, we will take positive action wherever, and whenever, it is needed to enable the public to enjoy the peaceful environment that Savernake Forest and the surrounding areas offer, in order to prevent any Criminal offences or Anti Social Behaviour from being committed.’

Not up yet, but when we are, it’ll be at:
Nottinghamshire Indymedia

We have a collective up and running, to make all this happen, and were having regular meetings and all …….

So, if you’d like to be involved with us, please send email to and sign up to the email list for Notts IMC at:

In the interest of group colaboration, we also maintain wiki pages at:

If you wish to contribute to those pages, you can sign up for your own Indymedia Wiki page.

You will thus have a ‘wiki name’ and password, and this will enable you to not only change your own personal page, but also many other pages on the system, including these pages at ImcUkNottinghamshire

For the Indymedia photographers, have just started a group page at:

So, as you see, plenty going on. ……..

Matthew Tempest and agencies
Wednesday May 25, 2005,3604,1491895,00.html

The price of an identity card will be higher than previously thought at £93, the Home Office admitted today, as it published a new bill to introduce the controversial scheme.
It also revealed that the biometric technology due to underpin the system was far from failsafe, with even the best form of identification – iris scans – only scoring a 96% success rate.

In documents accompanying the bill, the Home Office admitted that the cost to an individual of the card had risen to £93, as opposed to its previous estimate of £88.

The average annual running cost for issuing the controversial cards alongside passports was put at £584m.
At prime minister’s questions today, Tony Blair challenged the Conservatives to back the scheme, which will initially be voluntary, as it shaped up to be one of the key debates of the new parliament.

The Tories currently oppose the bill, as do the Liberal Democrats and a small minority of Labour backbenchers.

The reintroduction of the bill – which was a central plank of Labour’s manifesto – was greeted by dismay from civil liberty campaigners, but received a guarded welcome from employers.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said: “The horrendous economic costs of the ID card scheme are clear, the social costs will be with us for decades.

“Parliament must reject this rehashed ID card Bill, a scheme more about political machismo than rational policy.”

John Cridland, the deputy director-general of the Confederation of British Industry, gave it cautious backing, but said: “Companies want more information on the national identity registry and serious questions remain unanswered.

“What types of data will be stored? How will the government assure accuracy and integrity?”

The results of the pilot project testing the technology on 10,000 volunteers showed it took an average of just under eight minutes per person to be scanned, but a marked range in the success rates of the various identification techniques.

The facial verification system, which measures the distance between a person’s features, was the least successful technology.

Success rates were 69% for a representative sample of 2,000 people and 48% in a sample of 750 disabled people. Fingerprint verification was successful in 81% of the representative sample and 80% among the disabled group. Iris verification was a success in 96% overall and 91% among the disabled volunteers, the results showed.

Home Office minister Tony McNulty acknowledged there would be some “teething problems” with the biometric cards.

But he told the BBC: “I would hope, and I think we will, secure the bill.” He said it was “in essence” the same bill as the one introduced into the last parliament.

Mr McNulty refused to comment on the overall costs, saying: “The more we release about the details of the set-up costs the more the entire procurement process can be couched in terms far more favourable to those doing the bidding.”

One of the top civil servants on the ID cards project, Stephen Harrison, told the BBC: “We are following the best practice of not publishing our best estimate of the set-up costs.

“For reasons of commercial sensitivity we think it is inappropriate to publish them at this stage.”

Only 19 Labour rebels voted against ID cards last time round, although the No2ID campaign hopes that up to 80 could be persuaded to vote against it this time.

Whether that will overturn Labour’s new 67-seat majority will depend on whether the Tories stick to their line of opposing the measures. The Conservative leader, Michael Howard, is personally in favour of ID cards, having considered introducing them himself as home secretary in the 1990s, while shadow home secretary David Davis is against.

Mr Davis has written to the Home Office setting out a series of objections on the grounds of cost and technology, and challenging Mr Clarke to prove the case for ID cards.

The Liberal Democrats are opposed on both principle and cost grounds, as is the Scottish National party.

Originally the Home Office told the home affairs select committee the cost of introduction would be between £1.3bn and £3.1bn. Recent estimates range up to £5bn, and the government has a poor track record in major IT investments, such as the child support agency, the Swanick air traffic control centre and the criminal records bureau.

Wartime identity papers in Britain were abolished in 1953. The current scheme would be phased in from 2007-08 and though they will initially be voluntary the Home Office hopes to later persuade parliament to make them compulsory – possibly from as early as 2010.

So, here we go round again…… just published by the government today. Much the same as the last time round.

This is the PDF of the Bill

Explainatory Notes, Statewatch

Ho hummmm………..

Next Page »